Silence the opposition

Secret Police

Nancy Pelosi announced that the Capitol Police will be setting up a field office in Tampa whose purpose is to “protect Congress.” I don’t see where Congress gets the authority to police the states. Anyone see that in the Constitution anywhere? Chief Yogananda is happy about the power, money, and prestige that comes with being able to hunt down Pelosi’s political opponents.

Sundance over at Conservative Treehouse sees it like I do– this is an ominous sign that portions of the Federal government are making a power grab. This is something to be concerned about:

I will say it again…. stop and hear the drums… Something is about to happen; federal agencies are acting in a very proactive manner. This shift by Nancy Pelosi is yet another advance move in preparation for, or in defense of, something they are planning for. Either they are doing something; fearful of us discovering something; or they are preparing for us to react to something and they are pre-positioning assets to defend against it. They are all-in and it shows.

Sundance

Incidentally, I would bet you that the satellite offices are located somewhere near the US Attorney’s office, found here. Odd coincidence that it is across the street from “Gaslight Park.”

By Divemedic, ago

False Flag

To go along with my previous post on how the Biden administration is trying to silence the opposition, the Washington Post came out swinging today.

Their article is misleading. They are attacking Tucker Carlson for claiming that the January 6th events at the Capitol were engineered by the FBI. They set up a strawman to attack:

The sketchy and quickly debunked claims made by Carlson. The Fox News host was elevating a story written for the website Revolver by a former Trump administration official (later fired for links to white nationalists) arguing that “unindicted co-conspirators” referred to in Justice Department charging documents referred to government law enforcement agents. In other words, that the references implied a significant intertwining of FBI agents in the violence that day. But, as The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake reported, that term wouldn’t apply to FBI agents, and the “co-conspirators” identified by Carlson were at times clearly identifiable. One, for example, was obviously a suspect’s wife, based on the available information. Marrying someone for a long-game sting operation would be quite a level of commitment.

Debunked my ass. The FBI engineered it, but not by using actual agents. No, they did it by using FBI informants. I pointed this out way back in January. Even Reuters reported that the leader of the Proud Boys was an FBI informant.

In the Miami hearing, a federal prosecutor, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and Tarrio’s [Tarrio is the leader of the Proud Boys- DM] own lawyer described his undercover work and said he had helped authorities prosecute more than a dozen people in various cases involving drugs, gambling and human smuggling.

In a statement to Reuters, the former federal prosecutor in Tarrio’s case, Vanessa Singh Johannes, confirmed that “he cooperated with local and federal law enforcement, to aid in the prosecution of those running other, separate criminal enterprises, ranging from running marijuana grow houses in Miami to operating pharmaceutical fraud schemes

So the Washington Post either has a short memory, or they are deliberately lying.

We know the FBI can and will do so. Remember how Sandy Hook resulted in a 1500 page report from the FBI, but the Las Vegas shooter report was only three pages?

By Divemedic, ago

Ministry of Truth

This article from the Free Beacon engenders a certain amount of concern from me. There are some scary statements in there. Let me point out a few of them:

the Biden administration endorses the “Christchurch Call,” a series of sweeping regulations to “eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online.” Governments that endorse the Christchurch Call support media “industry standards … to ensure that reporting on terrorist attacks does not amplify terrorist and violent extremist content.”

Can anyone think of how the press would have reacted to this statement if it had been made by the Trump administration?

According to DHS, warning signs that internet content may be the product of a disinformation campaign include a lack of “contradicting information” and articles that do not include the names of authors, a standard practice by news outlets such as the Associated Press and the Economist.

So first you claim to be targeting “online extremists” and then say that any article that doesn’t include the author’s name is a sign that the article is disinformation. Perhaps that author doesn’t want to be vzyali.

This is why I set up the server that is hosting this blog and others. It is only a matter of time before many voices are silenced.

By Divemedic, ago

Terminator

Donald Trump has been marked for termination. The Communist Democrat party has decided that he must be destroyed, and they have sent their Terminator, the New York State Attorney General, to get rid of him. In addition to the Manhattan DA, the New York AG is now investigating the Trump Organization ‘in a criminal capacity.’

They will not stop until they have killed his chances of influencing the national stage.

Listen. And understand. That terminator is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

By Divemedic, ago

From the commies at Facebook

I got a notice from Facebook over the weekend, telling me that I something I posted violated Facebook’s community guidelines. I was thrown in FB jail again. That’s odd, I thought. I haven’t posted ANYTHING to Facebook in months, ever since I was tossed in FB jail for things that I had already been thrown in FB jail for before.

Some history. I stopped posting to FB when I was given a 7 day ban on January 10 because:

Multiple posts from the last year didn’t follow our standards.

Yeah, I know. You suspended my account no fewer than 11 times in the 12 preceding months. Still, I had done nothing new to merit such a ban. Because of that, I only made three posts after the ban ended on January 18. One was to change my profile pic to an announcement that I would no longer use FB, and instead would be found on Gab, MeWe, and Parler. The second was to post this picture:

Then the third was on February 24, which was a link to the article in TIME magazine, where they admitted to rigging the election. When I said the election was rigged, it got me a ten day ban. It turns out that I was right.

Still, what was it that I did to violate the community standards of FB this time? So I logged in to find out, and it turns out that I was banned again for posting this picture all the way back in August of 2020:

My punishment? Apparently, FB says that the business page that I manage is not permitted to do any paid advertising for 30 days. So what? I stopped all paid advertising for all of my businesses with FB a year and a half ago because of this exact sort of thing from them.

I don’t care about your website any longer. I am no longer providing content to draw eyeballs for you to sell, nor am I a consumer of the content of others that you are selling. Fuck off.

By Divemedic, ago

What *ARE* the guidelines?

The reason that I posted my last post on crime statistics was because of my research on a post for local media. I shouldn’t have bothered. They are only interested in publishing their own version of truth.

They claim I violated their community guidelines, which I can’t find anywhere. It appears like they are:

I think that this happens because we were beating them in the realm of ideas. We were using facts and logic, while they were using emotions, hyperbole, and dick jokes. Once they realized that wasn’t working, it was time to silence us. This is the adult equivalent of putting your hands over your ears while yelling “LALALALA. I can’t hear you.”

By Divemedic, ago

Silence opposing opinions

Last week, I posted that a local TV station was censoring my comments. Here are some more of my comments that were censored in the past few days, with the station claiming that my comments violated community standards:

On people being required to wear masks, even after being vaccinated:

If you still need to wear a mask after being vaccinated, the vaccine is useless.

On businesses who can’t get employees because people would rather collect unemployment:

1 Call people who are on unemployment
2 Offer them a job
3 If they refuse, they are no longer eligible for unemployment. Report them.
4 Repeat as necessary

Community standards seem to include any opinion that doesn’t conform to the Democrat party line.

By Divemedic, ago