The woman who decided to come after my job and my rights to speak? I don’t know if it’s because of Social Media blowback, or if it was in response to me emailing her employer, but her Twitter account is now set to private.
Who got silenced now, bitch? Since you like Breakfast club quotes so much (that is how I found so much of your shit- you used the same quote on every one of your social media accounts)
We are not taking your shit any more, Karens of the world. Check Target’s stock price for more details.
EDITED TO ADD:
This was all she got with all of that:
I had to remove the post that called her a whore. Hey Stephanie- how did your meeting with HR go?
The liberal skank that threatened to come after this website and my job? Thanks to a reader tip and a short records search, I know who she is.
She threatened to contact my employer to get me fired. She contacted this website’s registrar in an attempt to have this blog deplatformed. She posted to social media, asking people to help identify me so I could be canceled. She tried to doxx me. Turnabout is fair play.
She is Stephanie Tuttle Coccarelli of Fredonia, NY and is 30 years old. She has worked as a recruiter for a home health agency since February 2022. She is no record of her having a nursing license in NY, so her profile claim of being a nurse is a lie. The agency is a home health care agency and she is an office drone. She claims that she has fired lots of nurses for refusing to honor a patient’s pronouns and claims that she will get my HR to do the same to me if she can figure out who I am and where I work. She doesn’t hire or fire anyone. Again, HR office recruiter drone. Here is her picture. Note the Magic Marker drawn in eyebrows and glasses that make her look like Mrs. Potatohead.
The more she wants to come at me, the more of a profile I will build. If she keeps it up, I will get a PI and a lawyer. Defamation, libel, and slander suits can be a real bitch.
I may send a comment to her employer today to let them know how she spends her workday.
So in response, I sent this message to her employer, using the contact us link on the website.
I would like to let you know that one of your recruiters, Stephanie Coccarelli, is spending her workday on social media telling nurses that she will write to their employers and get them fired for disagreeing with her political opinions. You don’t have to believe me, check it out for yourself. Her twitter handles are @stephc1024 and @stepht1024. I’m staying anonymous because she is obviously vindictive.
Do I think she will get fired? No, but I am betting that her boss will talk to her about this. Maybe she will eventually back off of attacking me. The worst she can do to me at this point is get my Twitter account banned. So? I have several, just like she does. Banning me from Twitter won’t hurt me a bit. It isn’t like I wasn’t banned several times during the Liberal censorship days before Musk bought the place.
I really enjoy pissing off people like her. She is a liberal, antigun, proabortion, pro-tranny leftist moonbat who spends her working hours on social media doxxing, insulting, and attacking people on Twitter. She decided to threaten me, my business, and my job online because I made a statement of opinion, then proceeded to do exactly that. So turnabout is fair play. This isn’t work, it’s actually fun.
My sister called me last night. She works as a teacher here in Central Florida. She was contacted earlier in the week by her Principal because the mother of one of her students contacted the Superintendent’s office to complain that her son was being “targeted” by his teacher, as evidenced by his poor grades and discipline problems. The district office is sending an administrator to my sister’s school, so that they can meet with my sister, her Principal, and the parent to discuss the problem.
The problem? The kid is being suspended for calling another kid a “nigger” while they were at lunch. My sister isn’t the one who wrote the referral, the Principal is. My sister, as the teacher, was required to email the parent, as per district policy. The mother was very angry and claimed that her child “doesn’t even know that word.” She then demanded that my sister call her so they could discuss it. My sister wisely refused, and wants everything dealt with in writing. So that is why the parent has complained.
As soon as I heard “targeted” I knew without being told that this was a black student who was going to throw down the race card. I told her that, since this was a discipline meeting, she was entitled to have her union representative there as a matter of Federal law. I don’t really like a lot of what the union does, but in this case, it’s important to remember that there will be two administrators and a parent there. You will be alone, and need a witness there that will be somewhat impartial.
When I told her that, my sister replied, “Oh, no. The principal told me that this wasn’t a meeting where I would be disciplined. It’s just an informal meeting.” No. There is no such thing as an informal meeting when there are multiple administrators in a room with a parent making racism accusations against you. You are white, and that means you are guilty. If either of those administrators can avoid trouble by tossing you in front of that bus, they will do it without a second thought. That’s when my sister said, “Oh my principal is black. She told me that she knows I am not a racist.”
Oh shit. It was at that point that I began to wonder whether or not my sister should bring not just a union rep, but a lawyer. If this woman wants to claim that racism is why her child is failing and getting in trouble, the only white person in the room is going to be the target.
Racism is a serious charge for a teacher. Not only will it cost you your job, it can cost you your teaching license. There goes your career, and my sister doesn’t have the looks for only fans.
I’ve seen this show before. I know how it turns out. You can win, but you need lawyers, representation, witnesses, and money. I got in that fight back in 2016, and I wound up quitting and going to a different school. The old school then tried to have my professional licenses revoked. They failed and I won, but it cost me nearly $10,000 in legal fees and I wound up switching jobs.
I don’t think that my sister has that kind of money.
So when the meeting happens this week, she will have a union representative there. At least she took my advice. She usually asks for my advice, then goes in a different direction. Then she comes to me and wants advice on the situation that she got into because she didn’t follow my original advice. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Several NHL teams are catching static because their players are refusing to wear rainbow themed uniforms during pregame warmups. The league declared an annual ‘Pride’ month to honor faggotry, and now some of the players are refusing to drop to their knees. (see what I did there?) The left is trying to cancel them, calling them names like “coward” because they won’t honor this woke garbage.
I thought that sports teams were supposed to support the political statements of their players, or does that only apply when they are kneeling during the national anthem?
The flaw lies in the methods of the researchers. They sent two sets of identical resumes in to prospective employers in an effort to test “whether or not the inclusion of gender-neutral pronouns impacts how employers perceive resumes.” Both featured a gender-ambiguous name, ‘Taylor Williams.’ The only difference between the test and control resumes was the presence of gender pronouns on the test version. The test resume included “they/them” pronouns under the name in the header.
The flaw here is obvious. In order for a study to be valid, you should conduct the test with the control having only one difference from the test. That difference is called the dependent variable. In this case the dependent variable is the presence or absence of preferred pronouns, NOT the presence or absence of “they/them” as opposed to “he/him” or even “she/her.”
So all they have proven is that people who put preferred pronouns in their resumes are less likely to get hired. They set out to prove that nonbinary applicants were being discriminated against, but all they managed to provide was evidence that employers don’t want the drama of assholes who insist that everyone use their preferred pronouns. It’s my guess that, should the study be repeated with the other pronouns, the results would be similar. The last thing that a company needs is some woke gender pronoun warrior running around, creating drama and potentially suing because they were misgendered.
Companies don’t like drama, they don’t like getting sued. Companies are funny like that.
If you are a Christian with a teaching certification who lives in Arizona, or are a student at Arizona Christian University, you should sue the school board of the Washington Elementary School Board for saying that Christians can’t teach there
Proselytizing is embedded into how they teach. And I just don’t believe that that belongs in schools.
