Insanity

More About the Nashville Shooting

So an update to the douche canoe that shot up the Nashville school. The transgender, whose pronouns are now was/were, was a student there in 2006. This delusional piece of human shit originally looked at shooting up a different school, but selected the private school as a secondary target because the primary target had security that would have made successfully killing a bunch of kids more difficult. Gun free school zones resulted in death this week, and there is no other way around it.

Nashville Metropolitan Police Chief John Drake said that Hale was “prepared to do more harm than was actually done,” and that she had drawn up plans to attack another school in the area, but backed out of them because the school was too secure.

per the New York Post

The police in this case did a good job, even advancing on the school while under fire. (Take THAT, Uvalde pussies.) Still, the shooter had 14 minutes to shoot and kill people. They claim that the shooter didn’t have any mental problems, but that is false. Delusionally believing that you are a different sex than you are is a delusion, and its a mental problem, even if political correctness has removed it from the DSM.

The assailant was armed with a Kel-Tec SUB2000 carbine (9mm), a Smith and Wesson Shield EZ (9mm), and a Lead Star Arms grunt (5.56mm). Only one of them was legally a rifle, and it fires pistol cartridges. Still, the usual suspects are lining up to demand more gun control, specifically a new AWB. There are even some calling for the banning of all guns. I don’t see any of that happening in my lifetime, short of someone seizing control of the government and outlawing Congress. Both parties get too much in fundraising cash by using this as a wedge issue.

Still, there are many who are pointing out that Congress is debating gun control, and exactly on cue, there is a mentally deranged person shooting up a school. It happens like clockwork.

By Divemedic, ago

TN School Shooter is a Tranny

Notice how the press isn’t really spreading that around? Yeah, the shooter is described as a 28 year old female former student named Audrey Hale. I thought that was odd, mostly because the vast majority of school shooters are men, and 28 years old is a bit old for a former student to be holding a grudge. After all, the school only teaches to 6th grade, meaning that this loon wasn’t a student there for at least the past 16 years.

It turns out, not so much. The shooter, according to the Nashville Police Chief, is a man who claims to be a woman: a tranny. (Confirmed with a second source here)

While police initially described the suspect as a 28-year-old white woman, social media profiles under Hale’s name list he/him pronouns. Nashville Police Chief John Drake said at a press conference Monday afternoon that Hale was transgender.

The police also revealed that this shooting was planned for some time, with the date being chosen for some sort of significance as stated in his manifesto (don’t the usually have a manifesto?).

A search of Hale’s home turned up “maps drawn of the school, in detail, so, surveillance, entry points, et cetera,” Drake said. Cops also found a manifesto and “some writings that pertain to this date, the actual incident… of how this was all going to take place.”

They even stereotypically described him as “quiet” and a bit of a loner. I’m sure that he chose the school because it was a soft target. Of course, the left is already dancing in the blood of the victims and demanding that we “do something” meaning, of course, ban guns and is already lining up to say that the shooter’s gender is irrelevant to the shooting.

I say that the fact that the shooter is transgender IS relevant to the facts of the shooting, since we know that 32-50% of transgenders are suicidal. Perhaps its time to add anyone with gender dysphoria to the NICS prohibited database. Now that puts the left in a quandry- they will be forced to choose one or the other- admit that firearms ownership is a civil right for everyone, or that transgenders have mental problems that justify denying firearms ownership.

By Divemedic, ago

MD Dems Seek to Decriminalize Murder

That’s not a typo. Read what they are trying to do: (pdf alert)

(B) A PERSON WHO WAS UNDER THE AGE OF 25 YEARS AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE MAY NOT BE FOUND TO HAVE COMMITTED MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE UNDER SUBSECTION (A)(4) OF THIS SECTION.

OK, so what does subsection (A)(4) say?

(4) SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION, committed in the perpetration of or an attempt to perpetrate:
(i) arson in the first degree;
(ii) burning a barn, stable, tobacco house, warehouse, or other outbuilding that:
1. is not parcel to a dwelling; and
2. contains cattle, goods, wares, merchandise, horses, grain, hay, or tobacco;
(iii) burglary in the first, second, or third degree;
(iv) carjacking or armed carjacking;
(v) escape in the first degree from a State correctional facility or a local correctional facility;
(vi) kidnapping under § 3–502 or § 3–503(a)(2) of this article;
(vii) mayhem;
(viii) rape;
(ix) robbery under § 3–402 or § 3–403 of this article;
(x) sexual offense in the first or second degree;
(xi) sodomy as that crime existed before October 1, 2020; or
(xii) a violation of § 4–503 of this article concerning destructive devices.

If this passes, I am going to have to add Maryland to the “no go” zones list.

By Divemedic, ago

Garbage, Not Science

I saw this a week or so ago, and wanted to comment, but hey, lots of things going on. There is this study being talked about that claims resumes with they/them listed as pronouns are more likely to be overlooked than other resumes. It’s a garbage study. Let me explain:

The flaw lies in the methods of the researchers. They sent two sets of identical resumes in to prospective employers in an effort to test “whether or not the inclusion of gender-neutral pronouns impacts how employers perceive resumes.” Both featured a gender-ambiguous name, ‘Taylor Williams.’ The only difference between the test and control resumes was the presence of gender pronouns on the test version. The test resume included “they/them” pronouns under the name in the header.

The flaw here is obvious. In order for a study to be valid, you should conduct the test with the control having only one difference from the test. That difference is called the dependent variable. In this case the dependent variable is the presence or absence of preferred pronouns, NOT the presence or absence of “they/them” as opposed to “he/him” or even “she/her.”

So all they have proven is that people who put preferred pronouns in their resumes are less likely to get hired. They set out to prove that nonbinary applicants were being discriminated against, but all they managed to provide was evidence that employers don’t want the drama of assholes who insist that everyone use their preferred pronouns. It’s my guess that, should the study be repeated with the other pronouns, the results would be similar. The last thing that a company needs is some woke gender pronoun warrior running around, creating drama and potentially suing because they were misgendered.

Companies don’t like drama, they don’t like getting sued. Companies are funny like that.

By Divemedic, ago

The Miami Herald Supports Child Pornographers

The title from the Miami Herald reads:

He was homeless and mentally ill. A judge sentenced him to 150 years. Is that justice?

The article tells a story about a man who they allege is mentally ill and was caught in possession of child pornography after he sat in public with his computer and was showing that porn to multiple passers-by.

In 2016, he walked into a Sweetwater Best Buy and snatched a laptop and other merchandise. When employees confronted him, he pulled out his own laptop, declaring, ”Look, I have child pornography!” He began publicly showing his computer screen, lying down between two sets of sliding doors and perusing the illegal images as customers walked by.

Prosecutors offered him a plea deal, where he would plead guilty to one count of possession of child pornography and receive three years. He refused that deal.

So they pressed on with 30 counts of possession, that being what was found on his computer. Throughout the trial, the defendant refused to talk to his attorneys or participate in his own defense. He also refused to undergo mental health evaluations.

So he rolled the dice, went to trial, and the judge gave him the maximum sentence for each of the 30 counts. The total was for 150 years.

After the conviction, after all appeals have been exhausted, now this criminal and his attorneys begin screaming that NOW he has submitted to a psychological exam, and the psychologist claims that he is “unlikely to reoffend.” Why is that? Have his psychological problems been cured? Why wait until after sentence has been passed? Sounds to me like the reactions of a logical mind that is now hoping for a second bite at the apple and using his schizophrenia as an excuse. You don’t get a “do over” simply because you gambled and lost.

Now the Herald whips out the race card. They claim that in a perfect world, Stephens would’ve received treatment for his mental illness. He would have never become homeless or walked into that Best Buy. No, in a perfect world, those children would never have been victimized, and in a perfect world, the defendant in this case wouldn’t have victimized them a second time by having photos of the crime, and victimized yet a third time by him displaying photos of their victimization to the public.

It’s hard not to wonder what Stephens’ fate would have been were he not homeless, mentally ill; if his family had been in court and not thousands of miles away in Michigan, where they didn’t even know that he had been arrested; if Stephens weren’t Black, factors that historically have put defendants at a disadvantage.

What the Herald fails to mention is that, after moving to Miami in 2015, he racked up a list of criminal convictions in Miami Dade – 8 of them for 2015 and 2016, everything from trespassing, to petit theft, and even felony battery. Now this. The man moved to Miami and became a one man crime wave. Through these 8 cases, his mental issues weren’t used as a defense by his attorneys once. Not once.

What next? Rape a child? Kill someone? At least in prison, society is protected from this menace. I am willing to be that this behavior didn’t just begin when he came to Miami. The Herald engages in typical liberal hand-wringing over this criminal’s need for psychological help, while ignoring the child victims of his crime. They merely wave away possession of child pornography by saying “Stephens wasn’t accused of producing or distributing the pornographic material.” which is false, because he was sitting there in the middle of the mall, showing the photographs to passers by. That is, in fact, distribution.

I am sick and tired of the left yammering on endlessly about the rights of criminals while ignoring the rights of the victims of their crimes. However, if my child were one of his victims, I would be sorely tempted to plea for his release so I could mete out the vengeance that his crimes are screaming for.

I am willing to bet that, should that happen, the Herald wouldn’t be running stories to celebrate my cause.

By Divemedic, ago

Facebook: Now with 100% more man tits

If your think is checking out the titties of chicks with dicks, you can check out Instagram and Facebook. They are lifting the rule against showing off naked tits, as long as those titties belong to trannies. Here is my question: If dudes who claim to be women are women, why the qualification? Aren’t all women OK to show off their snuggle puppies?

This kind of thing illustrates that the left doesn’t really believe in what they are selling. They know the difference between real and fake women.

By Divemedic, ago

Obvious Outcome

The one obvious outcome of people’s belief that you can be whatever you believe yourself to be- man, woman, or any one of other genders you invent for yourself- is that gender isn’t the only thing you can be. Of course it was mocked in memes, but as we all know satire is becoming reality in mere minutes lately.

As there is only one outcome, it was just a matter of time before gender identity morphed into other things. Southpark predicted this in the episode “Mr. Garrison’s Fancy New Vagina” where one of the characters decided that he wanted to become a woman. Other townspeople then got surgery to become all sorts of things, including one man who decided to become a dolphin.

As life is now become satire, we come full circle when we see that one man is upset because his son won’t speak to him now that he has abandoned his career as a banking executive and spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to become a “genderless dragon.” Yes, it’s as goofy as it sounds.

Before and after

There is no limit to the stupidity that we are seeing from people now. This insanity has got to stop, but we all know that it’s going to continue to get worse until sane people do something about this national psychosis that we all seem to be living in.

By Divemedic, ago