Medical News

Terry Bradshaw says:

I understand ‘immunized.’ What you were doing was taking stuff that would keep you from getting COVID-19. You got COVID-19. Ivermectin is a cattle dewormer. Sorry, folks, that’s what it is.

The World Health Organization releases a list of essential medicines every two years. I am linking to the current one (2021) here. In fact, I am placing the WHO list on my page of training materials. This is a list of medications that the WHO considers to be essential for the treatment of human diseases and disorders. This is how the WHO describes the list:

The core list presents a list of minimum medicine needs for a basic health-care system, listing the most efficacious, safe and cost–effective medicines for priority conditions. Priority conditions are selected on the basis of current and estimated future public health relevance, and potential for safe and cost-effective treatment

Ivermectin is on that list (pages 6 and 24). So is hydroxychloroquine (page 55).

The reason that Ivermectin is being mocked as being a horse dewormer is the government of this nation is actively trying to prevent people from using it as a treatment for COVID to the point that any doctor prescribing it is at risk of losing his livelihood. It isn’t just Ivermectin. The Biden administration is using the power of government in cutting off other medications as well.

For this reason, people are being forced to turn to veterinary sources for medication to treat COVID.

Terry Bradshaw, who is just a stupid jock, needs to stay in his lane.

One week ago, my employer announced that vaccines would be mandatory by November 24. A good number of employees have resigned. It started with non medical staff- the people who work preparing meals, cleaning, etc. A few medical professionals, and not many technical personnel. I don’t yet know why this is so, but the nutrition and environmental services departments are hurting.

Another story of a hospital refusing to give a COVID patient Ivermectin, even to the point of watching a patient die, even to the point of defying a court order.

Ivermectin is being called an “alternative treatment.” I don’t see why. What is it an alternative to? There is no treatment for COVID. All the hospital does is supportive care. That is, they administer oxygen and vitamins, then wait to see if you get better. Those who begin to deteriorate are given drugs to maintain their blood pressure. Even if the patient survives at that point, they are likely to lose fingers and toes as a side effect of the blood pressure medication.

I don’t see the harm in giving Ivermectin, especially the ones who are in the final stages. However, there are hospitals all over the country who are refusing, because they would rather play politics than actually save lives.

When we are to the point that medical professionals are actively denying care to patients while watching them die, even to the point that they are defying court orders, then there really is only one remedy.

If my wife were to get sick and the hospital and its staff watched her get sick and die while actively refusing to provide treatment, there would be a list in my pocket of each and every person who killed her. I would then have a close and personal discussion with each of them, so that I could explain to them in unmistakable terms the consequences of this decision.

Physicians in Central Florida are recommending that you vaccinate children aged 5 to 14 against COVID.

Since the vaccine doesn’t prevent infection, the only possible reason for accepting the vaccine is to lessen the severity of the illness.

According to the NIH, the COVID fatality rate of children in that age group is 0.02 per 100,000, which is 1/10,000 the rate of the US population as a whole, which is 215 per 100,000.

Currently, the COVID vaccine has an adverse reaction rate of approximately 20.7 per 100,000.

The adverse reaction rate for the vaccine is thus approximately 1,000 times higher than the risk of COVID for that age group.

The science and the math don’t lie. Even using the US government’s own figures and accepting them at face value says that the risk of the vaccine is greater than the benefit.

In the UK, the BBC runs a story stating that a third of COVID cases are among the unvaccinated. Doesn’t that also mean that two thirds of cases are vaccinated? It goes on:

• Nearly 13% of hospital patients with confirmed Covid were unvaccinated.
• 80% of patients have been double-dosed with a vaccine
• 99% of people who tested positive for Covid in the past week in Wales were under 60
• 84% of those under 60 are vaccinated

So let’s look at the numbers. If 16% of those under 60 are unvaccinated, and 13% of those who are hospitalized are unvaccinated, then that would mean that the vaccine has little to no statistical impact on COVID hospitalization.