Sweepstakes

Faxon firearms is having a sweepstakes. One lucky person will win:

  • Faxon Firearms Sentry 16″ 5.56 Modern Sporting Rifle (1) with custom Cerakote & Laser work completed by One Off Coating LLC
  • Leupold & Stevens DeltaPoint Pro NV (1) & DeltaPoint Pro Cross Slot Mount (1)
  • TOPS Knives Operator 7 Knife (1), TOPS Trucker Hat (1), Operator 7 T-Shirt (1), TOPS Shot Glass (1)
  • INFORCE WMLx Light (1)
  • OTIS Technology 5.56 Defender Series Cleaning Kit (1)
  • Action Target PT Scout Complete Kit with 12″ AR500 Circle (1)
  • Weber Tactical AR Mag Pouches (2), Trifecta Holster (1)
  • DoubleTap Ammunition 223 Rem 62GR DT Lead Free SC-HP 20rds (6)

click this link

Disclosure: I entered. If you enter, you get bonus entries if you refer other people. That is why I am posting this. Otherwise, I don’t receive a thing.

Why is it my responsibility?

Amanda Rinehart is a mother in Pennsylvania who left her job to care for her 8 year old child. She complains that her child is too young to receive a vaccine, so she has to keep her child out of school until there is a vaccine for children. For that reason, the US taxpayer should continue to pay for her to not go to work, according to her. In all, she has received more than $37,000 from the government since she quit working, if you only count unemployment, the free money for having a kid, and the COVID stimulus money.

On the other hand, only 39 percent of the US public paid Federal taxes last year. I was one of them. While a large part of the US population was sitting at home for the past year, not doing anything, I was working, investing, and providing the money for her to sit on her ass and complain that she isn’t getting enough of MY money.

I would argue that Ms. Reinhart isn’t losing HER unemployment. She is merely losing her ability to suck even more of my money out of my wallet, and the wallets of my fellow taxpayers.

You will note that there is absolutely no mention of a Mr. Rinehart. Where is the father of this child? How am I responsible to provide for his child, yet he is not?

The people on the left will say that I am greedy because I don’t want to help her. I have no problem helping the poor, as long as they are attempting to help themselves. I don’t see how it is greedy for me to want to keep my money for my own use, yet not greedy for this woman to demand access to my money with the only claim to it being that she couldn’t keep her legs closed.