A proposed bill in Florida will change the law concerning rape. Now in Florida, a man and a woman can have couple of drinks followed by a sexual romp, and if one of them later decides that sex was a bad idea, have the other charged with rape.
Why? Because the old law required that the victim had been drugged without their consent. Now the law will be changed so if one or both of them are intoxicated of their own free will, they are considered mentally incapacitated, and the other is guilty of rape.
The only way to get laid is to have any potential paramour sign a legal release with at least two witnesses certifying that the signatories do not appear to be impaired by any intoxicating substances.
A Texas board has withdrawn its request for a George Floyd Pardon. I don’t understand why they wanted to pardon him in the fist place. It isn’t like he would have been released. Where he is, there is no pardon.
The board claims that his death in Minneapolis has nothing to do with the pardon request. That is bullshit, and everyone knows it.
A guy in a gym is looking at a woman. That apparently justifies her and her husband in threatening the man. It isn’t a crime to look at someone, but it certainly IS a crime to threaten someone with violence.
Chicks like this dress the way that they do because they WANT people to look at them. They just don’t want people who they find unattractive to look at them. If the man had been “hot” she would have enjoyed the attention and continued to show off for him. Because he wasn’t physically attractive, she decided to play like she was offended. These women seem to think that they can use or threaten force because a guy that they don’t find attractive dares to look at them. This is evidenced by the fact that they post videos and pictures of themselves all over the internet for people to ogle. They enjoy being the center of attention.
Back in 2011, I was standing in line in a Quizno’s sandwich shop in Tampa. The woman who was standing in line in front of me had on one of those midriff-bearing tops, and had a tattoo in the middle of her back. The tattoo was in an old English type of font, with her pants covering the lower half of the letters. I was standing in line, trying to figure out what the tattoo said when she turned around and asked me what I was staring at.
I replied that I was looking at her tattoo, and asked her what it said. Now it’s been my experience that people with tattoos love to show them off. Not this woman. She got angry and said, “Did I give you permission to look at it? Where do you think you get the right to stare at me without my permission?”
Now my natural smartass came out at that point, and I replied “What were you thinking when you put on that outfit this morning- ‘Oh, I hope no one looks at me!’ ??”
At this point, some huge guy, presumably her boyfriend, comes over and asks her if I am bothering her. She replies in the affirmative, and the meathead tells me that we are stepping outside to settle this. I tell him that there is no way that I am going outside and that I am not going to fight him, to which he replies that either I am going to go on my own, or he is dragging me outside, and he is kicking my ass whether I like it or not.
At that point, I tell him that it would be a VERY bad idea to drag me outside, and tell him that he needs to just let it go. Long story short, I didn’t have to go outside, and I didn’t have to shoot anyone.
Perverting the justice system. That is the intent of the left. They were successful with infiltrating and intimidating the jury in the Chauvin case. They tried to intimidate the jury in the Rittenhouse case. Now they are trying with the Daunte Wright shooting.
A communist was arrested for attempting to intimidate the judge in that case. What did he do? He showed up at her apartment building, climbed up to the 12 floor, where he presumed that she lived, and stood outside of her door with a bullhorn, shouting, “I don’t know if this is her crib. I think this is her crib right here. We got confirmation that this is her house right here. We are here for one person in particular. We demand transparency. We’d hate you to get kicked out of your apartment.”
In Minnesota in 2010, he pled guilty to riding in a car without permission and was sentenced to 20 days in jail and 1 year probation.
In Wisconsin during March 2013, he was convicted of forgery (dismissed), Theft of less than $2500 by false representation- three counts (guilty plea), and theft of mobile property (dismissed). Sentenced to 24 months’ probation, suspended sentence. Sounds like a plea deal.
In Wisconsin during May 2013, he pled no contest to theft by false representation of less than $2500 and was given a suspended sentence of 24 months’ probation. Another plea deal.
A week later, he was in court again, same deal as the last one.
In Minnesota, he was convicted of accessory to misdemeanor robbery and was sentenced to time served plus three years of probation.
While on probation for the robbery, he was arrested and was sentenced to 5 years in jail in Minnesota for committing a crime of violence with a firearm in 2017, his first felony, thanks to a long list of plea bargains. At least some of his sentence was stayed. He also got 5 years’ probation.
He doesn’t turn up again that I can find until he began protesting during the George Floyd circus in the summer of 2020.
We are facing a movement of violent criminals who are being used as foot soldiers in a communist insurgency. Everyone that Rittenhouse shot had a criminal record. What are the odds that he shot the only criminals involved?
A pair of “teens” in a stolen pickup truck intentionally struck a police vehicle before leading cops on a chase that reached speeds of 110 miles per hour. One of them had recently been charged with second-degree murder. Another was on probation. They had no driver’s license, and there were drugs in the stolen vehicle. They claim that they fled because they were afraid the cops were about to murder them.
The fact that they were called “teens” with no mention of race should tell you what the picture will look like.
In response to my post about the increase homicide rates nationwide, a police officer from Houston sent me an email confirming that the same is happening in his city. Since he sent me an email rather that post a public comment, I will assume that he wants his identifying information held confidential. Here is what he had to say:
while we are nowhere near the 600-900 murders per year when I was a rookie in the early 1990’s, we had been cruising for years with 230-250 per year. Which ain’t bad for 2+million population and a police department with less than 5000 total classified officers.
Buuuuut, beginning in 2020 things have certainly changed: at this point in 2019 we had 249 murders enroute to around 300 total This time in 2020 it was 360 and ended up at 405, first time over 400 in years. This year, 2021, we are at 448 with a month to go. Probably gonna top 500.
Combination of low morale, administration that disincentivizes proactive policing, and officers not wanting to get screwed over, PLUS our local Soros-funded DA, Kim Ogg, putting violent offenders on the street with low/no bail to continually re-offend. Perfect shitstorm.
Things are looking worse all over. Once the police have collapsed nationwide, they will be replaced with cops who are more, shall we say, politically reliable. Maybe a national police force, maybe not. No matter what, they will be more amenable to the left.
MINOR ATTRACTED PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE. PEDOSEXUALITY IS REAL
LOVE IS LOVE
My first inclination was to do one of two things: either delete the comment, or publish the poster’s details (including the GeoLocation of his IP address. However, I don’t like using the ban hammer or the delete button. Instead, let me formulate my thoughtful reply and post it here.
I think that being attracted to minors falls into one of two categories. The first is a person who is attracted to someone that is post pubescent. That is, the people who are attracted to people in the 16 and up age range. This is a fairly widespread and common attraction. This is the reason why so many people found Brittney Spears attractive back in 200, when she first appeared on the pop music scene.
We see this all of the time with the popularity of the “schoolgirl” outfits that many women wear.
Since the target of their affection has all of the physical attributes of a full grown adult, the only thing separating them from full grown adults is the fact that they have poor decision making skills. That may or may not be part of the attraction, I wouldn’t know.
This is a dilemma faced by many a high school teacher. I know, I was one, and I can tell you that many of those 16 and 17 year olds are indistinguishable from 20 and 25 year old women, with some being quite attractive. Teens are all impulse and hormones, and have rather poor decision making skills. That is why they can’t consent to a number of things like contracts, intercourse, and other complicated decisions.
The thing is, you as the adult are the one who must act like the adult. Even though a teen is a victim of their raging hormones, you are supposed to be the adult here and remember that they are off limits.
One of the problems that I have with state laws concerning minors in this age group is there is no defense permitted by law if the adult involved has a legitimate reason to believe the minor is not a minor. I have blogged about this in the past.
That particular case involved a 13 year old who appeared older than what she was. She had a social media page indicating that she was a 19 year old divorcee. She engaged in a sexual relationship with a 20 year old man. Once he realized her age, he contacted and notified her parents. They called the cops, and he was jailed. The worst part of the story? This was the second time that she had done the same exact thing.
The second type of person who is attracted to minors are the people who are attracted to pre pubescent children. I have nothing but contempt for anyone who would even consider a sexual relationship with a 9 year old child.
When he was growing up, my son had a circle of friends. Let’s call one of them “Brad.” As they grew older, many of this circle married, some had children. Since they had been friends since they were 11 years old or so, Brad was welcome as a babysitter. Brad got married, his girlfriend got pregnant. They got married. All was well. Until police caught him distributing child porn, and some of the kids in the pictures were the children he was babysitting. Some as young as 3 years old.
He is currently doing time in Coleman Federal Prison. If I remember correctly, he is serving 20 years.
I have no sympathy for people who would prey on children. None. As an adult, we are supposed to protect those who cannot protect themselves, not use them as our sexual playthings. I have nothing but contempt for this sort of person.
