Roofing and Insurance fraud

Last week, I posted this as a comment to another post:

A couple of things are killing insurance in the area.
1 About a year ago, a couple of roofing companies were going door to door, offering a “free roof.” All you had to do was sign an “assignment of benefits” so they could bill your insurance. About a third of the houses around here took the offer. Now all of us who DON’T have a new roof are seeing increased rates. The price of honesty, I guess.

Here is a good example of the kind of stuff I was talking about.

John Sutton, doing business as Kaizen Construction Group, had salesmen go door to door in Pasco County in 2021 and 2022, instructing homeowners on what to say in filing an insurance claim, Florida’s chief financial officer said in a bulletin. Some of the homeowners agreed to sign “direct to pay” documents, essentially assigning benefits to the roofing company.

Investigators from the Department of Financial Services and the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office determined that Sutton and Kaizen Construction were unlicensed as roofers and were responsible for more than $41,000 in insurance claims. Sutton later reportedly made a statement saying that he has victimized hundreds of homeowners throughout the state, the DFS said.

There’s my answer

As you all know, I received a 12 hour ban from Twitter with no reason given. After the ban was over, I was given the reason. Here it is:

The story here is that some asshole wanted to know why the right was all pro-gun, unless trannies were involved. I responded with the above tweet, and attached a screenshot of the tranny advocating the killing of Christians that I also posted here.

Criticizing trannies got me a ban.

So I removed the tweet. It’s their playground and their website, so I follow their rules. However, I will still call them out for taking sides. They are not an immune service provider. The very act of censoring one side of a debate and not the other should make them liable for what they allow to be posted.

5 and a half years for this?

So the FBI has spent 5 and a half years not telling us what the motive for the Las Vegas shooter was, and now they try to tell us that it was because he wasn’t getting good enough comps from the casino? I call bullshit.

Then they try to sell us on the fact that he was angry because he wasn’t winning. That’s also bullshit. I am a bit of a gambler myself, although not even close to gambling as much as this guy did. Even I know that you don’t win all that much or that often.

In 2006, for example, Paddock gambled more than $945,000 and came out with roughly $4,300 in winnings…that during one stay from Sept. 12 to 14, just a few weeks before the shooting, Paddock lost $38,000.

A guy who gambles with a million at a time lost $38k? That’s nothing. I don’t buy for one second that the shooting had one thing at all to do with gambling or comps. The money quote is this one:

In 2018, Las Vegas Sheriff Joe Lombardo said that a 10-month investigation by the department resulted in “no evidence of conspiracy or a second gunman” and no definitive motive for the shooter.

Maybe the Vegas sheriff’s department should read this blog, because I found quite a few inconsistencies, and many of them look like the work of US intelligence agencies.